Shoham Choshen-Hillel

Published

​

• Guzikevits, M., & Choshen-Hillel, S. (in press). The optics of lying:  How pursuing an honest social image shapes dishonest behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology.

 

• Choshen-Hillel, S.*, Sadres, I.*, Gordon-Hecker, T.*, Genzer, S., Rechtman, D., Rekhtman, D., Caruso, E. M., Clements, K. L., Ohler, A., Gozal, D., Israel, S., Perry, A., & Gileles-Hillel, A. (2022). Physicians prescribe fewer analgesics during nightshifts than dayshifts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).      * Equal contribution.

​​

• Choshen-Hillel, S., Guttel, E., & Harel, A. (2022). Framing negligence. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 19, 296–339.

​

• Winet, Y., Tu, Y., Choshen-Hillel, S., & Fishbach, A. (2022). Social exploration: When people deviate from options explored by others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

 

• Gordon-Hecker, T., Shaw, A., & Choshen-Hillel, S. (2022). One for me, two for you: Agency increases children’s satisfaction with disadvantageous inequity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 100, 104286.

​

• Choshen-Hillel, S., & Gileles-Hillel, A. (2021). A wake-up call: Time to raise physicians’ awareness of the consequences of fatigue. Medical Education, 55, 1342-1344.

​

• Kaditis, A. G., Ohler, A., Gileles-Hillel, A., Choshen-Hillel, S., Gozal, D., Bruni, O., Aydinoz, S., Cortese. R., & Kheirandish-Gozal, L. (2021). Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on sleep duration in children and adolescents: A survey across different continents. Pediatric Pulmonology, 56, 2265-2273. 5.

​

• Barneron, M., Choshen-Hillel, S., & Yaniv, I. (2021). Reaping a benefit at the expense of multiple others: How are the losses of others counted? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 164, 136–146.

​

• Choshen-Hillel, S., Shaw, A., & Caruso, E. M. (2020) Lying to appear honest. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 149, 1719–1735.

​​

• Shaw, A., & Choshen-Hillel, S. (2020) Who are “we”? Dealing with conflicting moral obligations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 43, e86.

​

• Choshen-Hillel, S., Caruso, E. M., & Shaw, A. (2020). The downsides of trying to appear ethical. Harvard Business Review.

​​

• Choshen-Hillel, S., Ishqer, A., Mahameed, F., Reiter, J., Gozal, D., Gileles-Hillel, A., & Berger, I. (2021). Acute and chronic sleep deprivation in residents: Cognition and stress biomarkers. Medical Education.

​​

• Mandelkorn, U., Genzer, S., Choshen-Hillel, S., Reiter, J., Cruz, M. M., Hochner, H., Kheirandish-Gozal, L., Gozal, D., & Gileles-Hillel, A. (2021). Escalation of sleep disturbances amid the COVID-19 Pandemic – A cross-sectional international study. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine.

​

• Choshen-Hillel, S., Lin, Z., & Shaw, A. (2020). Children weigh equity and efficiency in making allocation decisions: Evidence from the US, Israel, and China. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 

​​

• Choshen-Hillel, S.*, Shaw, A.*, & Caruso, E. M. (2018). Disadvantaged but not dissatisfied: How agency ameliorates negative reactions to unequal pay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24, 578-599. * Equal contribution.

​

• Shaw, A.*, Choshen-Hillel, S.*, & Caruso, E. M. (2018). Being biased against friends to
  appear unbiased. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 104-115. * Equal contribution.

​

• Muller-Trede, J., Choshen-Hillel, S., Barneron, M., & Yaniv, I. (2018). The wisdom of crowds in matters of taste. Management Science. 

​

• Shaw, A., & Choshen-Hillel, S. (2017). It’s not fair: Folk intuitions about disadvantageous and advantageous inequity aversion. Judgment and Decision Making, 12, 208-223.                                                                   

​

• Shaw, A., Choshen-Hillel, S., & Caruso, E. M. (2016). The development of partiality aversion: Understanding when (and why) people give others the bigger piece of the pie. Psychological Science. 27, 1352–1359.

 

• Choshen-Hillel, S., Shaw, A., & Caruso, E. M. (2015). Waste management: How reducing partiality can promote efficient resource allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, 210-231         

 

• Choshen-Hillel, S., & Yaniv, I. (2012). Social preferences shaped by conflicting motives: When enhancing social welfare creates unfavorable comparisons for the self. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 618–627.

 

• Yaniv, I., & Choshen-Hillel, S. (2012). Exploiting the wisdom of others to make better decisions: Suspending judgment reduces egocentrism and increases accuracy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 427-434. (Lead article).

 

• Yaniv, I., & Choshen-Hillel, S. (2012). When guessing what another person would say is better than giving your own opinion: Using perspective-taking to improve advice-taking. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 48, 1022-1028.

​​

• Choshen-Hillel, S., & Yaniv, I. (2011). Agency and the construction of social preference: Between inequality aversion and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1253–1261.

 

       * This paper won the “De Finetti Prize” awarded by the European Association for Decision Making, 2011.

       * This paper was also announced as a runner up for the “Einhorn New Investigator Award” by the

Society for Judgment and Decision Making, 2011.

​

• Yaniv, I., Choshen-Hillel, S. & Milyavsky, M. (2011). Receiving advice on matters of taste: Similarity, majority influence, and taste discrimination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 111-120.

 

• Yaniv, I., Choshen-Hillel, S., & Milyavsky, M. (2009). Spurious consensus and opinion revision: Why might people be more confident in their less accurate judgments? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35(2), 558-563.

 

 

Papers under review

 

• Barneron, M., Choshen-Hillel, S., & Yaniv, I. Reaping a benefit at the expense of others: On the perception of aggregate social costs (under revision).

​

• Bigman, Y. E., & Choshen-Hillel, S. The role of motivation in moral judgment (under review).

​

​​​

• Kammer, J. E., Choshen-Hillel, S., Müller-Trede, J., Black, S., & Weibler, S. Advice-based decisions: An integrative review (under revision).

​​​

Work in Progress​

​

• Choshen-Hillel, S., Guttel, E., & Harel, A. The Hand-Formula Debate: A Behavioral Analysis (in preparation).

​

• Choshen-Hillel, S., Gordon-Hecker, T., & Shaw, A. Let them choose: Children’s satisfaction with agentic decisions (in preparation).

​​